My initial movement in this array of ideas was towards traditional text. Perhaps in a few words, a reaction against (that is, in motion opposite - not dismissive of) the more digital and incorporeal forms of writing and idea-conveying that we've discussed. Books, as opposed to ebooks. Typewriters set to tablet computers. Handwriting instead of html and pixels.
Aligned with this movement, though joining a bit later, was a conception that I, personally, am not entirely sold on. Thylias mentioned the idea of words as constellations, seemingly close but in fact vastly set apart. At once such a notion conflicts with the trend towards the traditional but I can only - no, I must consider it more. The idea of constellations of text suggests three-dimensionality and what, if not length, width and depth, is truly vital to traditional text?
This third motion, ensuing of late, is probably best described by referencing the latest post regarding Arts and Bodies, in which the question of 'why, with the plethora of languages and their well-defined words, are there still barriers even within languages when it comes to conveying ideas?' My feelings are that language is more than the definitions and that the ideas conveyed require something more personally tangible. If we are to trust in language as an entity unto itself, whether it be conformed or chaotic sound, then we may only grasp portions of meaning. The format and context of the ideas conveyed is integral to meaning. Contrast a blog and a novel. The text may be the same but the reader will not read the same.
Interlaced with these movements, whether paralleling or completely tangential to them I am not yet sure, is an interest in text in transient format. Writing on chalk, sand or skin, for examples, have a transience that cannot be found in digital text -- which unless created on an isolated desktop with no chance of ever touching a network -- will ultimately leave traces of itself upon the fabric of the digital world (pending complete collapse of the internet).
As it stands, I am uncertain whether or not one of these directions will overtake the others. Maybe they will all blend. Or perhaps a new incarnation shall take form.
Or, to put it simply, my 'final' presentation will just include bits of all of them. Probably that one.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think this is very a interesting subject choice. I, myself, have often questioned the omnipresence of technology in our everyday lives, and the consequences of it. It is important, your exploration, and I am excited to see where it will end, or shall I say begin?
ReplyDelete-Kit